11 July 2018

Early Ditko

We've been looking at some of Steve Ditko's works, but mostly from late in his career. Let's peek at the other end of the spectrum.

The earliest published work by Ditko that i've been able to determine is actually a cover, oddly enough. Even back at his beginnings, they could see the value of his work. From October of 1952, the cover to Strange Fantasy #2 (not to be confused with the first issue, which was also labeled #2) -


Yes, he did interior work, too, and his art appeared regularly in the title over the next year.
At the end of that year, this odd little gem showed up. See if you can determine what made this Ditko tale from Black Magic #27 so strangely significant -


 What made this tale stand out was the creature. This panel is the only one in which the creature is drawn by Steve Ditko:


The rest of them? Jack Kirby stepped in to redraw the creature in the other panels.
Man - teaming up with Jack Kirby in your first year working in comics? Not bad.

Lastly, for now - Ditko's first appearance in Space Adventures. He'd return to this book at the end of the decade to bring us Captain Atom before he launched into his own title. Back in 1954, it was science fiction, not superheroics, and emblazoned on the cover. And, again, that cover is by Ditko - 



page art from Black Magic #27 (1953) and Space Adventures #10 (1954)

10 July 2018

Delving Into Ditko




As mentioned before, Steve Ditko was a man of mystery, preferring his work to be known for its own merits - standing apart from the creator. His last known photograph was taken nearly 60 years ago, and he stopped talking to reporters 50 years back.

But, this doesn't meant that there's never been any interview with him. Perhaps the most substantial comes from Gary Martin in the old 1965 fanzine, Comic Fan #2. Let's take a look at some of those questions and answers from those days at the height of his Marvel period.

The artwork on this page is much more recent, of course, coming to us from after Ditko tired of dealing with the big companies and struck out into independent territory.  (Note that this is not the complete interview, though most questions are presented here. He doesn't like blue pencil, okay?)
Do you prefer inking to pencilling?
Like both, each has its own fascinating problems.
Would you prefer to draw and ink or do you prefer other people to ink your pencils?
Rather do it all myself.

What type of pen do you prefer? Do you prefer pen to a brush?
I change off from one to the other. I use different ones, depending on how I feel. I like a Hunt 102.
Does Marvel allow their artists anything in the way of supplies?
Nothing supplied.


Have you ever considered syndicating a strip?
Yes, but not seriously.

  
Do you have any personal dislikes in comics?
I have them about everything.
What is your favorite TV show?
Don’t watch TV.


How long does it take to complete a page of art?
It depends on how I feel and interest in the story and deadline.


Who originated Capt. Atom?
Someone at Charlton Press. Don’t know exactly who as I just worked out costume, etc.


Who originated Spider-man??
Stan Lee thought the name up. I did costume, web gimmick on wrist, & spider signal.
Would you enjoy continuing on him?
If nothing better comes along.


About your art, have you ever attempted painting or any other field of art?
No

Do you/did you ever draw from models?
Once, when studying. 

(Parts of this interview were included in an excellent 3-page article on Ditko appearing in this issue.)

Other than practice, practice, and practice, what other advice to ‘budding’ young artists do you offer?
Learn what is right & wrong about drawing or art. Practicing bad drawing habits is an awful waste.
Study anatomy – you should know what is under the skin and how it moves.
Study people – to see how he muscles & bones cause the various shadows, bumps & shapes – their gestures, emotions, habits – everything about them.
Study other artists – to see how they interpret anatomy, people, etc.
Everything today, whether it’s a light bulb or the English language – or a car, is the result of people building on the knowledge before us. Everyone adding something of their own.
That is why you must study –
1. The basic anatomy, composition drapery, and even story telling.
2. Then seeing how this basic anatomy, or basic drapery looks on human beings in various poses, lighting or conditions, wet clothing is different than dry.
3. And studing other artists to see how they interpret the basic anatomy composition, drapery, etc.
This does not mean you can copy what they do – but help you understand how it is done and why. To show a man laughing – means definite muscles must move, yet 10 different artists can draw 10 different pictures and all be right and not two drawings alike. Basically, yes – they’re all the same – since smiling action must conform to anatomy, but the artist’s individual approach to how to show it sets him apart.
1. Study the basics
2. She how it appears in life
3. How others interpret it
4. And from it all do it in a way that you personally feel is right or good.


To close out, i'll let Steve share a bit of wisdom that touches close to home. Here he explains why i haven't seen an advertisement for a movie in many, many years. Thankfully, the networks told me to go away when they informed me that they'd be broadcasting for stupid people and addicts only*, so they're a lot easier to avoid these days.



page art from The Mocker, 160 Page Package, Mr. A, and Strange And Stanger - possibly among others. (I failed to make my proper notations while so perturbed over the recent losses)

===
*(No, seriously - i'm not merely being facetious. Back in the 90s when it was getting started, i contacted several networks over the new practice of placing "bugs" on the screen. (Bug is the industry term for that little logo, so they know) I was informed that this was for the benefit of their viewers. I was told that their viewers were too stupid to find the channel without help, and so  - the bugs. Visually distracting? Who cares - it's just tv crap! Nothing worth a damn. And like small dogs marking expensive carpets with their piss stains, they can't see they're destroying it by marking it as theirs. So, while i may watch a number of shows, i watch no broadcasts, having no use for the networks who have nothing but contempt for both their shows and their viewers. I won't even go into the stupidity of erecting barriers to immersive entertainment as a reaction to losing market share to more immersive entertainment forms. They can dick-wave all they want, but i'm not interested in sadly rotting meats.) 
(Gee - no wonder why i'm so enamored with Ditko, hm?)

09 July 2018

Random Reflections On Ellison (& Ellis)

As noted last time, i've been off reading through old Harlan Ellison and Steve Ditko tales.  I find it difficult to speak comprehensively about either of them in any way at the moment. Instead i'll just be touching on various things that occur to me while perusing their old works.

I'm just going to assume that you know who Harlan Ellison is/was - right? Big time  scifi   science fic- speculative fiction writer - Outer Limits, Star Trek, Starlost and such for folks who don't read. (What are folks who don't read doing reading here, hm?) While Harlan had a long career in prose, television, and movies, he also had a tangled history with comics. In fact, his first published writing was in comic books.
Though perhaps not what you were thinking, it was a letter to Real Fact Comics back in 1947, way back around the time of his Bar Mitzvah -


And so began an adversarial relationship with editors that lasted seven decades. Every word revealing Harlan's own personal feelings and evaluations cut & tossed for the bit the editor liked about parental approval. Makes it rather easy to see how he learned to be so defensive of his words.

Here's another odd little bit i stumbled across today.
As far as i can tell with my currently crippled archive access, Harlan Ellison's first credited story for comic books (newsstand magazines like Creepy counting separately) was the plot for Avengers #88 in May of 1981 -


Should you decide to go looking for it, be aware that the story continues in The Incredible Hulk #140:


What makes it Odd is - that same month, May of 1981 (in both cases, cover date) the Justice League of America ran this tale:


Okay - that doesn't seem too odd. I mean, beyond the fact that the two titles started out 3 years apart but are now only 1 issue apart in numbering. But this was the Silver Age, which means that cover is lying - unless YOU are Harlan Ellison. (To add confusion to the premise, the narration addresses you as though you were Black Canary.)

So, in the same month that Ellison debuted in Marvel's big team book, he also debuted as the 'villain' in DC's big team book. Most passing strange.
It being comics, everybody likes to have a special identity, so we'll call him Harlequin Ellis in this tale.

Harl'n has met and fallen hard for Black Canary, and the two seem to connect a bit - much to the anger of Ollie Queen, who breaks things up and all head their separate ways. But Ellis, son? He's in a deep mood and heads straight to his outlet - the typewriter...*



A Note: One thing that is semi-required when reading any comic book stories adapted from or about Harlan Ellison is a solid working knowledge of the titles of his stories and books. They're not really dangerous dreams - they're Dangerous Visions. That would likely slip by unnoticed, but without the key to play the game, you'll encounter strangely clumsy dialogue, like a reference to Shattered Like A Glass Goblin -


...or I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream...


Okay - continuing on...


Canary's questions force him to try to act as Superman, but he fails to rescue the JLA members from his own manipulations and, in the process, he causes the death of his dream version of Aquaman. (Leading the "glass goblet" breakdown above.)
This leaves him temporarily shattered by his own unworthiness and unintended crimes, but...


...and so...


...and this time trying directly to remove Green Arrow from the equation. But when Dinah moves to rescue Oliver...


...and once again he's forced to foil his own plans.  In the end, he realizes it can't work and they embrace the '70s -




Nor shall Harlan Ellison ever be forgotten.
(EDIT: But i forgot to credit Mike Friedrich with this story. Sorry, man. And sorry things didn't work out with us - timing was just bad.)

Actually, i doubt he'll let us forget. There's probably a data line being laid to his resting place so that when he gets angry enough, he'll start sending out more words into the world. A little thing like death of the body could hardly stop him...


I'll be eagerly awaiting that magnificent outburst.

page art by Dick Dillin and Joe Giella from Justice League of America #89 (1981) and Avengers #88 (1981), Ellison portrait by Ben Templesmith from Wormwood: Gentleman Corpse # 4 (2006)

===
*(No apologies - bad puns like that are de rigueur for Ellison based comic tales)

Bad Weekend, Continued

Still feeling down and uptight about the news of losing two favorite creators... Harlan Ellison and Steve Ditko.


Those mixed feelings of sadness and anger at the loss. Harlan was better at letting that stuff out...


I think i'm going to spend the day meandering through some of their works to say goodbye, though of course, they'll never truly leave us. Not with all they left behind. I'll be back later in the day to share. In the meantime...

Sergio Ponchione offers us this view of Steve Ditko from his book, DKW, on the Holy Trinity of comic creators - Ditko/Kirby/Wood -


art by Neal Adams from Weird Heroes #2 (1975) and Sergio Ponchione from DKW (2014)

Blue Monday Calendar 2018 - Week 28

From 1968, we have a Ditzler Advertisement as the source of this week's always lovely Gil Elvgren painting. Let's hope it portends a lovelier week -


art by Gil Elvgren (1968)