05 September 2017

Revenge Of The Tooth

Still only marginally functional with half face swollen. So here's some quickies from the sort bin.

Toothache feels like it was drawn by Sienkiewicz (this only works if you know what Asterix typically looks like):


From Buster Crabbe #1's back cover, Frazetta helps stave off juvenile delinquency in 1951:


FOOM #19 had a wrap cover featuring the Defenders. Could you have picked which two would wind up (in hero identity) in the TV version?


This is actually a little old now.


Okay, into the cue and off to severely self medicate.


04 September 2017

Blue Monday - Bonus Wood



There was no Blue Monday last week, in honor of Jack Kirby's birthday. So here's an extra installment today in partial recompense. Continuing with out Wally Wood theme today, let's go back to the first two issues of National Screw Magazine. We saw previously that the first four issues debuted an exclusive new strip from Wood - Malice In Wonderland. While this has been reprinted quite a few times, it's usually in black and white. So here's the first half from their original run in National Screw:

NOTE: The images from this post contain nudity, and thus have been moved to our back room for adult content. The text remains that you may make a fair guess as to whether or not you wish to look at the first two chapters (4 pages each) of Wally Wood's Odd classic.
Please follow this link to The Other Voice Of ODD! archive of the original post to view the artwork.


As the caption said - Continued...


Malice In Wonderland by Wally Wood for National Screw #s 1 & 2 (1976)


Blue Tooth

Bad toothache erupted. Minimal post for


Today, Wally Wood mimics Al Capp to show us a secret bit of L'il Abner & Daisy's story...


NOTE: The images from this post contain nudity, and thus have been moved to our back room for adult content. The text remains that you may make a fair guess as to whether or not you wish to look at the pics.
Please follow this link to The Other Voice Of ODD! archive of the original post to view the artwork.




That bit of hidden history comes courtesy of Wally Wood's Gang Bang #1:


Okay - I'm going to go play with some string and a doorknob. I'll leave you with another quick bit of Wood:


Lil An' Abner by Wally Wood for Gang Bang #1 (1980), Man Of Steel, Woman Of Stone from Gang Bang #3 (1981)

03 September 2017

The Woman Is A Wonder, But...

Now that Wonder Woman's coming out for home video, it seems like a good time to talk about the movie, and my problems with it.

With that introduction, let me first say that i very much enjoyed the movie. It's far and away the best DCEU offering to date. I'm not saying it's a bad movie - it's quite enjoyable. And you probably already know all the reasons it's a good movie. I'm assuming you've seen it by the time you read this, because i'm not concerned with spoilers here. (Though they're actually pretty minimal.)

My first problems with the movie turn out to not be Hollywood problems, but actually recent changes from the comic book itself. And this one's just a minor annoyance.
Making Diana a "god"? She wasn't uniquely special enough before? You have to give her new labels that don't really mean much of anything other than how small is the writer's perceptions of what constitutes a god. That's a common trend in modern comics. Go back to guys like Steve Englehart, and you'll see him trying to lift the readers up to see big concepts. These days, they try to make big concepts small and drag them down to us.

The second is a bigger issue, but no surprise when i learned it was instituted by the current DC comics crew - they changed things so now Diana's powers are derived from a Man. Originally, she was empowered by Hera, Aphrodite, and the other goddesses. Nope. That's no good. We need Zeus so a man gives her power.
This is tragically typical of the sort of thinking i see from them the duds at DC these days.

So, on to the problems that can be pinned on the movie itself...
The first is simply the colour pallette. This was likely imposed by the WB/DC powers as part of the dark Elseworlds they're basing their movie universe upon. It's funny that with all the worship of the first Christopher Reeves Superman movie, they totally miss the genius use of colours. Throughout the film, we never see primary red, blue or yellow until Superman's costume appears on screen. The subtle impact of that is a profound unconcious reaction making him even more larger than life and iconic.
But, that only works for Heroes seeking to inspire, to be symbols of hope or justice. The people currently in charge are not fond of the hero concept. And so we wind up with a Diana who wears brighter red in her civilian outfits than her battle armor. The modern DC superhero costumes have colours only grudgingly, out of obligation. They'd rather have black military garb, it seems.

The next one is a bigger problem, and one that is way too common is superhero adaptations.
Wonder Woman is one of the most powerful individuals in the DC universe. She can slug it out with Superman, throw tanks, fly, etc., She's backed by the power of the gods, and can call upon an array of magickal artifacts for greater power when needed. She's Awesome!
But Hollywood writers typically either think that our heroes are weak, or the writers themselves are too weak in imagination/talent to find a victory for the hero in the story they've written. So they create a new power specifically to resolve the confrontation. This is a big, and common, problem with movie adaptations. Even that revered Superman movie gave him the power to alter time for their climax. Readers know that's beyond him - he's not a god. He's tried repeatedly to alter the past, but Time & Reality are not his to play with. (Unless, y'know, he got his mitts on the Infinity Gauntlet or something)
Seriously - these are characters who generate complaints because they're too powerful to write good stories about, and yet they keep having to make up new powers for them? And not just "Oops, we ran out of money - give him repair-the-Great-Wall-of-China-vision".
At best, it's lazy writing. At worst, it's contempt for the character.
Just Stop It!

The last one is the biggest, and is highly indicative of how far our society has fallen in this century.
The transformation of Wonder Woman's lasso into a torture device. It no longer magically compels one to speak the truth, it now painfully forces the truth from the victim, torturing them until they speak.

Just like Nazi & Soviet "heroes" would have done.



02 September 2017

Saturday Solutions (No Really)

I realize that there was no puzzle in yesterday's Friday Fun & Games, but extra time was given for last week's puzzle.
So here's the answer matrix for the

01 September 2017

Random Thought on DCEUpid Design Theory

I'm trying to imagine the design meeting for this costume...

"Oh! I know! We can cover his costume in all kinds of little crap that will cause lots of drag when he moves at speed. That way his outfit will constantly be flying apart when he runs. 
That'll look so cool!"

Coming soon - Flasher Flash.

pity poor Ezra Miller in this 3rd rate Flash Costume from Justice League

Friday Fun & Games - Coloring Kirby


We're going real simple this time - no puzzles, just fun. In the wake of the King Kirby 100, seeing as adult coloring books are enjoying some popularity, here's a collection of a half dozen Jack Kirby drawings to enjoy colouring yourself::







Bonus! this great BullsEye image has some grey tones, so it didn't make the cut for the six used. But, if you're colouring on computer, just colour beneath the layer and use the tone. (If that makes no sense, ask.)


all art by Jack Kirby (& friends)

31 August 2017

Mainlining Kirby (King Kirby 100)


In 1954, Jack Kirby and his long time partner, Joe Simon, were tired of making other people rich while getting screwed on their agreements. The two of them were THE superstars of comics, consistently producing some of the highest selling titles on the market. Simon & Kirby was the first byline to be plastered on covers to increase sales. They were creative and market gold, but saw only a tiny fraction of the wealth they produced.
So together they formed Mainline and started publishing their own books.

Sadly, what could have been the greatest comics enterprise in history was killed by timing and random chance. It really all boils down to their choice of distributor - Leader News, and a power hungry attention whore named Wertham. You may have heard of him. He was one of those particularly venal evil types who decided to screw society by making up facts and selling fear. You know, like most modern public figures.
His goal - destroy one of only two art forms created in America. So, obviously some sort of anti-American type, too. Probably a terrorist...

Anyway, he triggered a social meltdown which centered, in part, on EC, one of the largest publishers of the day. EC was distributed by Leader News When EC collapsed, it took the distributor and many smaller publishers with them as their payments were not forthcoming and yet, all the bills showed up just fine.
Mainline was suddenly bankrupt. With the Fates seemingly against them, Joe Simon called it quits with the comics business, and Jack Kirby wound up taking work at what would become Marvel Comics.

But... What if they'd chosen a different distributor? What if Mainline hadn't close down just as it was getting started?

First - without Jack Kirby's input to revitalize the company (and one meeting with Martin Goodman in particular that forstalled the event), Marvel comics would likely have closed its doors as the 60s began.
No Fantastic Four. No Thor. No Hulk, Iron-Man, Spider-Man, Avengers, Etc.,. No Marvel Age.

Meanwhile, over at Mainline...
Jack wouldn't have taken his Challengers Of The Unknown to DC, Mainline would have put out the title. With BullsEye already one step removed from a cowboy superhero, and the Challengers basically non-superheroes, odds are that Simon & Kirby would have soon launched into full superhero action before long.
I noted before that in their first months at Timely (Marvel) back in 1940, they launched The Vision, Marvel Boy, and Mercury - a mythological god brought down to Earth and recast as a Superhero. With Marvel Comics shut down, odds are good that Mainline could have re-acquired, either through legal contest or outright purchase, the rights to Captain America, their first superstar creation. They might even have picked up the rights to some of their other old characters at the same time, if it's a cash deal. Martin Goodman might likely have offered them to up the buyout value.

Oddly enough, they might even have given a job to the kid who got his first writing break from them, churning out the Postal Permit required text pages for Captain America, starting back in #3. That's unlikely though, as we've been told he would left comics have gone on to write the great American novel when Goodman closed up shop. It's more likely that Steve Ditko would have found himself working there, as Mainline offered better money and better deals for the creators, as Simon & Kirby had always done with their previous shop.

The early 60s would very likely have seen some very familiar seeming comics - an Earthbound god, an elemental based quartet, the return of Captain America, possibly The Vision (maybe with Ditko artwork, if we were lucky?), and a host of others - since they would not have been trapped in the bad distribution deal with National, as Marvel was.
Jack & Joe were already setting their eyes on older audiences in the late 50s. Their revived superhero titles would likely have followed this path as well. Their willingness, even eagerness, to experiment would have provided dynamic contrast to the set & staid house style at DC, and we could very likely have seen the Mainline Age of comics in the 60.

Kirby's Fourth World work would have come sooner (as evidenced by his paintings & designs of the late 60s), and at Mainline. (Best part about that - Jack Kirby would have no connection at all to Batman Vs. Superman & what follows in the DC movies) The New Gods & Apokolips would likely have been a part of the ongoing Mainline universe, very likely encountering their 'old god' superhero.

It's really impossible to guess what things would have been like, because even if we were possessed of Kirby's boundless imagination, who can say where it would have gone. That's kind of the whole point of "boundless".
But there's one of which we can be certain...

"It could've been ... Glorious."




Ah, well...   let's look at a couple other What If notions. Back in 1995, Darcy Sullivan was pondering in The Comics Journal...


WHAT IF JACK KIRBY HAD OWNED HIS OWN MARVEL CHARACTERS?


Lastly, we have a series of Bullpen Bulletin notices from a different reality. One which asks, What If Jack Kirby Hadn't Left Marvel In 1970?


Want to hear Craig McNamara's logic and alternate history behind these Bulletins? He elaborated in Jack Kirby Collector #53.
It's been 100 posts, and we've barely scratched the surface of Jack Kirby and his artistic legacy. This ends the King Kirby 100 commemoration, but Jack will continue to be a frequent subject for quite some time to come. We may have lost the man, but The King will always be with us...


page images from The Comics Journal #181 (1995), Jack Kirby Collector #53 (2009), and Weekly World News (1996)

One More TIME! (King Kirby 099)


Let's jump back just over half a century, to 1966 in the Merry Marvel Messenger (the newsletter of the M.M.M.S.* - that which came before F.O.O.M.).


In this rarely seen paper, Jack Kirby gave us perhaps his most unique tale of his life up until the Marvel Age of Comics.

MEET JACK KIRBY


Bonus Content! Here's a couple Kirby family photos from a bit earlier, before the arrival of the Kid From Left Field:



Autobiography by Jack Kirby from Merry Marvel Messenger (1966), Kirby family by Jack & Roz (ongoing)


===

*(If you didn't know and it was driving you crazy, that's the Merry Marvel Marching Society)